Home » Uncategorized » When is an increase a “cut?”

When is an increase a “cut?”

In 1983, the Federal Government spent about 19 billion dollars on Medicaid.

 

In 2001, total Medicaid spending jumped to 129 billion.

 

In the current budget, 389 billion is allocated for Medicaid.

 

Under the GOPs earlier proposals, that spending would increase to 500 billion dollars annually within a decade.  Over that same time, Obamacare calls for Medicaid spending to end up at just above $600 billion per year.

 

But the overriding arguments we have heard in regards to AHCA is that it would “kill people.”  Otherwise-sane individuals are suggesting the measure would be the equivalent of genocide.

 

Explain to me how a 27% increase in spending over the next decade is “killing Medicaid.”  It’s not even a cut.  By definition, it is the OPPOSITE of a cut.

 

Disagree with AHCA all you want.  I don’t like it one bit; but for entirely different reasons I suspect.  You can call it short-sighted, badly-thought-out, inadequate.  But do NOT try and start any honest debate with the theory that a 27% increase in Medicaid spending amounts to gutting Medicaid and killing people.  It makes you look silly and ignorant.  When I hear people spew hyperbolic nonsense like that, I ignore them.  They are clearly not interested in debate.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow me on Twitter

%d bloggers like this: